bankssilikon.blogg.se - Access vs filemaker pro

#Access vs filemaker pro mac os x
#Access vs filemaker pro pro
#Access vs filemaker pro software

We actually employ many respectable developers who love using FMP. I'll admit to bias on this subject - I work with one of the larger FileMaker development shops out there, and have written the odd book on the subject. You can build rather complicated applications very quickly with it if your willing to deal with it's deficiencies. On the other hand, for a smaller organization in need of a customizable in-house database it could be a great boon. It's difficult to have multiple people developing on the same solution.

#Access vs filemaker pro pro

In general I would say that if you're developing exclusively for the web or a large organization Filemaker Pro probably isn't the best fit.

Layout design is fairly static and dated (this is improving with the Filemaker 12 and above).

Requires the mouse to access functionality.

Unable to copy and paste/import or export some items from solutions.

Pretty much only drag and drop programming, you can only use predefined script steps, relationships are made by making a graph.

The plugins required to extend functionality can be expensive as well.

#Access vs filemaker pro software

In addition the server part of the software is about $300-$800 a year

Expensive compared to the free alternative: It costs about $100 per year for a local user, $150 per developer, if you are using it as a website you need specialized hosting, which tends to cost more.

Inflexible: it does what it does well, but if you need more your out of luck for the most part.

Built in support for importing exporting excel, cvs, tab-formatted.

Has some neat built in tricks like built in graphs, tab controls, web viewers.

Changing field/database/script names after the fact is free.

For the most part, drag and drop programming.

Anyone with access can edit the program.

There are many plugins available to extend functionality.

Cross-platform (Mac OS X, Windows, iOS).

Easy to deploy locally, turn on sharing and connect from another client.

Here are the pros and cons of using Filemaker Pro vs PHP/MySQL/HTML in my experience. Comparing the two, they both have pros an cons. It's like you have MySQL, PHP, HTML and your editor put together in a GUI. They're both in the same category of software, they're integrated programming environments.

#Access vs filemaker pro mac os x

Technology agnostic - Works with any tool or service, database or file type.Calling Filemaker Pro, Access for the Mac is kind of like saying, Mac OS X is Windows for the Mac. Users can build, debug and test functionality using common operations for functions, types and services. It is often used in conjunction with other low-code tools to provide the API or integration services that those tools are not designed for.ĭeveloper Experience - Typical use is similar to working in any other traditional IDEs. Programming Paradigm - Linx is not constrained by a domain or use-case driven paradigm. It can be used for any backend application in any domain with no limitations on connections to other tools and services. Solutions are deployed with one click to servers running in the cloud or on-premise.Īll-Purpose - Linx is an abstraction of programming itself and not domain, process or tooling specific. Linx enables the rapid development and deployment of back-end applications like APIs, integrations and automations.ĭevelopers design and debug solutions in a familiar procedural style using a drag and drop interface with access to 1000s of ready made functions. A general-purpose low-code platform for back-end development.